<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>pooter.net/blog &#187; YouTube</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pooter.net/blog/tag/youtube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pooter.net/blog</link>
	<description>mostly harmless.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 17:42:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comparing iPhone 3GS video to Flip Ultra</title>
		<link>http://pooter.net/blog/2009/06/27/comparing-iphone-3gs-video-to-flip-ultra/</link>
		<comments>http://pooter.net/blog/2009/06/27/comparing-iphone-3gs-video-to-flip-ultra/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 12:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pooter.net/blog/?p=224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People seem to be in love with the new iPhone camera, which is quite an improvement over the camera used in the first generation and 3G. I haven&#8217;t seen that many video comparisons of what its video looked like compared to the inexpensive video cameras out there such as the Flip so I thought I&#8217;d <a href='http://pooter.net/blog/2009/06/27/comparing-iphone-3gs-video-to-flip-ultra/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People seem to be in love with the new iPhone camera, which is quite an improvement over the camera used in the first generation and 3G. I haven&#8217;t seen that many video comparisons of what its video looked like compared to the inexpensive video cameras out there such as the Flip so I thought I&#8217;d do a brief comparison. [Update - for more info on the Flip Ultra, see here <a href="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/Pure-Digital-Flip-Ultra-Camcorder-Review-33383.htm#">(Camcorderinfo review)</a> or here <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Flip-Video-Ultra-Camcorder-30-Minutes/dp/B000V1PXL4">(Amazon page with user reviews)</a>. By the way, I purchased my Flip Ultra 30 minute on sale from Amazon for $60 a couple months ago.]</p>
<p>First, the iPhone 3GS:</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/14Hqqs8U5gE&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/14Hqqs8U5gE&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>Second, the Flip Ultra:</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XejusbjRoSM&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XejusbjRoSM&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>A couple of notes. Since these get transcoded by YouTube, what this test shows is how the video from these cameras look like <em>on YouTube</em>. This is perfectly fine, since that&#8217;s how we&#8217;re uploading and watching our videos more and more. I think I might next upload a phone video to compare YouTube to MobileMe, but that will be for next time. But be advised that this transcoding process softens up the images of both a bit.</p>
<p>The most obvious difference between the two is the color cast: the iPhone&#8217;s is cooler, the Flip Ultra&#8217;s is warmer. It also seems as though the Flip Ultra&#8217;s exposure is a bit brighter, maybe a a half-stop, maybe a little more.</p>
<p>Both videos have the visible CMOS artifacting at times (the jelly rolll), but nothing that&#8217;s not to be expected with this technology and nothing extreme at all.</p>
<p>Conclusions? I think I prefer the full size video from the iPhone on the computer, but maybe give slight preference to the Flip Ultra on YouTube, perhaps for its slightly brighter exposure.</p>
<p>One last note: the famous video editing on the iPhone is destructive. I haven&#8217;t heard this mentioned many places, so user beware before trying this feature on footage you don&#8217;t want to throw away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pooter.net/blog/2009/06/27/comparing-iphone-3gs-video-to-flip-ultra/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Linking to higher Quality YouTube video</title>
		<link>http://pooter.net/blog/2008/11/14/hello-world/</link>
		<comments>http://pooter.net/blog/2008/11/14/hello-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pooter.net/blog/?p=1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kottke, via Daring Fireball. The &#8220;format 22&#8243; is really very sharp.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.kottke.org/08/11/high-quality-youtube-video-hack">Kottke</a>, via <a href="http://www.daringfireball.net">Daring Fireball</a>. The &#8220;format 22&#8243; is really very sharp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pooter.net/blog/2008/11/14/hello-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

